Nanusens solves the problem of stiction in MEMS inertial sensors by going smaller and creating nano-sensors in standard CMOS
Nanusens has announced that its CMOS nano-sensor technology has been successfully used to solve the problem of stiction in MEMS inertial sensors, which is a major source of failure for this type of sensor.
“Our first silicon nano-sensor samples from GLOBALFOUNDRIES exceeded our expectations showing outstanding resilience to stiction, with the devices going through more than 10,000 switching cycles, each equivalent to more than 1000G shocks,” explained Nanusens’ CEO, Dr Josep Montanyà i Silvestre. “And the sensitivity is an order of magnitude above what is needed for a motion sensor in most applications.”
The problem of stiction in MEMS is caused by attractive forces that occur on microscopic levels such as Van der Waals and Casimir. These are surface area dependant and not mass dependant. In an inertial sensor design, there is a proof mass connected to a spring. This mass moves when there is an acceleration and the movement is detected by the mass acting as one electrode and the change in capacitance is measured relative to a second fixed electrode. However, if there is a large movement such as from a shock or collision, the mass goes beyond the normal range of travelling and touches a surface enclosing the sensor where it ‘sticks’ due to the attractive forces and stops working. This can be countered by having stronger springs but this reduces the sensitivity of the sensor. A solution to increase the sensitivity could be to increase the mass but this results in a greater surface area for the mass and so, unfortunately, more attractive forces.
The approach used by Nanusens is to reduce the sensor design by an order of magnitude from Micro ElectroMechanical Systems (MEMS) with linear feature sizes of 1-2um to Nano ElectroMechanical Systems (NEMS) where the features are 0.3um. This reduces the attractive forces significantly as the surface area reduction is in two dimensions, i.e. almost two orders of magnitude reduction. Reducing the proof mass could result in decreased sensitivity except this is offset by reducing the gap between it and the fixed electrode. The size reduction also means that the energy stored on the proof mass when it hits the surface in case of a shock, it is much less and the travelling gap is also small. A shock with less energy is also easier to detach.
“Therefore, by reducing all the dimensions of the device, we keep the sensitivity and we increase the reliability,” added Dr Montanyà. “In fact, we have such a gain in reliability, that we can increase sensitivity and still have a very reliable device.”